Alfred Jarry’s Days and Nights: Unraveling the Pataphysical Maze of Desertion and Illusion
- David Lapadat | Music PhD

- 2 days ago
- 5 min read
Born in the shadow of the same era that gave us Thomas Mann—imagine the literary cosmos aligning such disparate orbits—Alfred Jarry emerges as a figure who dances on the edge of culture’s precipice, teasing horrors and readers alike with relentless ingenuity.
Each encounter with his prose flips expectations: what first strikes as profound insight dissolves into vulgar nonsense, only for the dismissed vulgarity to reveal layers of startling depth upon revisit.
He’s not perched on my shelf of favorites, yet his shadow looms as an odd muse, fascinating in ways that evade easy labels, perhaps best left to pataphysical whispers.
Have you ever picked up a book that mocks your every attempt to pin it down?
Jarry’s Days and Nights: Novel of a Deserter (1897) does precisely that, weaving a narrative so slippery it questions the very ground beneath your feet.
Alfred Jarry: The Architect of Absurdity
Alfred Jarry, that diminutive Breton provocateur (1873-1907), lived a life as fragmented and explosive as his writing.

Expelled from school for his irreverence, he stormed Paris in the 1890s, armed with a bicycle, revolvers, and an unquenchable thirst for absinthe.
His invention of ‘pataphysics’—the science of imaginary solutions, a realm beyond metaphysics where exceptions rule and logic bends to whimsy—set the stage for movements like Dada and Surrealism.
Think of it as philosophy’s mischievous twin, echoing Nietzsche’s eternal return but twisted through a funhouse mirror of French symbolism.
Jarry’s brief military stint in 1894-95, marked by pranks and feigned illnesses, fueled his disdain for regimented life.
This experience bled into his works, where discipline morphs into farce.
His infamous Ubu Roi (1896) scandalized audiences with its grotesque king, a precursor to absurd theater.
But Days and Nights, published a year later, feels like a quieter rebellion, a deserter’s diary disguised as fiction.
Short on plot but rich in haze, the novel draws from Jarry’s own army days, yet it transcends autobiography.
What if the act of desertion isn’t just physical, but a mental evasion into dreams?
Peering into the Novel: Synopsis Without Spoilers
At its core, Days and Nights follows Sengle, a soldier ensnared in the monotonous grind of military existence.
Desertion becomes his escape, not through fields or borders, but via hallucinatory drifts between wakefulness and slumber.
Jarry blurs these states so masterfully that readers question where one ends and the other begins—a technique that anticipates Freud’s dream analysis, though Jarry predates The Interpretation of Dreams by two years.
The narrative fragments into episodes: barracks banter, feverish visions, and philosophical detours.
Sengle’s brother Valens appears as a spectral double, embodying the split self.
Illness stalks the pages, not as mere ailment but as a portal to altered perceptions.
War’s machinery grinds on, absurd in its precision, while personal torments unfold in intimate shadows.
This isn’t a linear tale; it’s a mosaic.
Jarry scatters clues about polarity—positive and negative as mere flips of perspective—leaving you to assemble them.
And that military discipline?
It sharpens tools for destruction, a paradox that lingers long after the last page.
Pataphysical Threads: Absurdity in War and Illness
Pataphysics isn’t just Jarry’s gimmick; in Days and Nights, it pulses as the novel’s hidden engine.

Defined in his later Exploits and Opinions of Dr. Faustroll, Pataphysician (1911, posthumous) as the study of what lies beyond the laws governing phenomena, it here manifests in the absurdity of institutional life.
Military drills, meant to forge unity, instead highlight isolation; orders barked for efficiency breed chaos in execution.
Consider the Vedas’ ancient hymns, where duality (light/dark, creation/destruction) reveals unity.
Jarry inverts this: his polarized world—health vs. sickness, duty vs. defection—collapses into sameness. Illness, often dismissed as weakness, becomes a pataphysical tool for insight, much like how shamans in indigenous traditions use altered states to navigate realities.
Sengle’s fevers aren’t debilities; they’re gateways, echoing psychological concepts of dissociation where the mind flees trauma.
But here’s a puzzle: if war’s horrors are absurd, why does Jarry cloak them in playfulness?
The answer circles back to his life, riddled with poverty and addiction, yet defiant in eccentricity.
Short bursts of dialogue punctuate longer reveries, mirroring the novel’s rhythm.
One scene’s vulgar barracks humor flips to profound musing on existence, a shift that jars yet enlightens.
[Related: Freud’s Totem and Taboo: Psychoanalytic Insights into Human Origins, Taboos, and Cultural Evolution]
The Falsehood of Polarization: Two Sides, One Coin?
Diving deeper, Jarry dismantles the illusion of opposites.
In Days and Nights, positive and negative aren’t enemies but reflections.
Military discipline, lauded as virtue, equips for slaughter—a commentary sharper than any anti-war tract.
This echoes Lao Tzu’s Tao Te Ching, where opposites birth each other, but Jarry spikes it with irony: the enemy’s face mirrors your own in the rifle’s gleam.
Sengle’s desertion embodies this.
Is he coward or visionary?
The novel suggests both, and neither.
Polarization, Jarry implies, is humanity’s crutch for a chaotic world.
Psychology backs this: cognitive dissonance theory posits we rationalize contradictions to maintain sanity, yet Jarry revels in them, forcing discomfort.
What if this polarity extends to reading itself?
Dismiss a passage as nonsense, and it rebounds with meaning; embrace profundity, and vulgarity smirks back.
This loop—opened in jest, closed in revelation—mirrors life’s deceptions.
Longer reflections dominate here, as Jarry’s ideas demand space to unfold.
His influence ripples into Camus’ The Myth of Sisyphus, where absurdity reigns supreme, or Kafka’s bureaucratic nightmares in The Trial.
But Jarry’s touch is lighter, almost whimsical, like a pataphysical prank on existential dread.
Personal Echoes: Inspiration Amid the Chaos
I can’t claim Jarry as a favorite—his prose often feels like wrestling fog—but he inspires in stealthy ways.
Reading Days and Nights for the first time, I shrugged off its fragmented style as immature, the weakest in his oeuvre despite hinting at the erudite games of Faustroll.
However, it revisits uncovered gems: that metatextual jab at war’s futility, or illness as a lens for truth.
It’s personal, this tug-of-war.
In an age of polarized debates—echo chambers amplifying extremes—Jarry’s novel whispers a reminder: divisions are illusions.
His pataphysical lens, applied to modern psychology, aligns with Jung’s shadow self, where integrating opposites fosters wholeness.
But Jarry doesn’t preach; he provokes.
Have you felt that pull, where a book’s vulgarity hides wisdom?
It’s why I return, fascinated, to his pages.
Short and sharp:
Jarry confounds, but enlightens.
Broader Ripples: Literature, Philosophy, and Beyond
Jarry’s shadow stretches far.
Surrealists like André Breton hailed him as a forebear, his pataphysics fueling automatic writing and dream logic.
In literature, traces appear in Joyce’s Finnegans Wake, with its linguistic acrobatics, or Borges’ infinite libraries—realms where exceptions define rules.
Philosophically, pataphysics parodies metaphysics, much like Derrida’s deconstruction unravels binaries.
But Jarry predates them, his novel a proto-postmodern text.
Artistically, think Dali’s melting clocks: time’s elasticity in Days and Nights prefigures such visuals.
Psychology offers parallels: hallucinations in the book resemble dissociative episodes in PTSD, a nod to war’s mental toll.
Even in music, John Cage’s chance operations echo pataphysical randomness.
This web of connections—opened earlier with Vedas and Tao—closes here: Jarry’s polarity farce isn’t isolation but interconnection.
Wrapping the Enigma: Why Read Jarry Today?
In wrapping Days and Nights, one realizes Jarry doesn’t conclude; he loops back, inviting endless rereads.
His weakest work?
Perhaps, but it seeds the pataphysical harvest of later masterpieces. In a world fixated on binaries—us vs. them, real vs. fake—Jarry’s novel offers a pataphysical antidote: embrace the blur.
Fascinating, isn’t he?
That initial tease of profundity amid nonsense resolves in inspiration’s quiet hum.





Comments