How to Read Mihail Sebastian: Fiction, Journal, and Theater
A woman falls from a tram; a young man is expected to explain his Jewishness; a diarist records music, new glasses, and frightening talk on the same day. Mihail Sebastian gives us several first encounters. Choose The Accident for fiction, For Two Thousand Years for belonging and exclusion, or Journal 1935–1944 for dated testimony by a writer who cannot turn the page to find out what happens to his life.
The forms call for different kinds of company. In a novel, another person's behavior may undo the explanation a protagonist has made of it. In the diary, a date restricts what could yet be known. Onstage, an official can keep somebody waiting at a ticket window while a perfectly clear request becomes more and more difficult to accomplish.
Allow the jokes, music, and awkward courtships to occupy the time Sebastian gives them. His later suffering is essential context for parts of the work, but it cannot explain every earlier attachment. A scene becomes poorer if we recognize only its future catastrophe.
Three ways in
For a fiction-first route, take The Accident → For Two Thousand Years → the Journal. Begin with the misreadings of an intimate relationship, move into a narrator's dealings with family and political identities, then encounter the changing days of Sebastian's own life. In the diary, dates and the route by which he heard something deserve as much attention as the statement itself.
If Jewish belonging and intellectual allegiance are your first questions, begin with For Two Thousand Years and continue with the Journal. Keep the novelist distinct from his narrator, even where their circumstances overlap. Read the diary in consecutive stretches, letting names acquire relationships, before turning to collections of its most appalling remarks.
For performance and dialogue, try The Star with No Name. Give its opening time to close a window, withhold an answer, or send a person across the room. The practical hindrances are part of the comedy. The Accident is a useful next book, since its people also discover how much a journey or a change of place can interfere with an imagined life.
These are available routes, not prerequisites. You can read a romance without first completing a course in Romanian political history. The diary asks more of its notes, especially when a measure or organization changes what Sebastian can do. Choose the kind of reading you want to sustain for the first book.
Let the people in The Accident surprise one another
Nora falls from a tram at the beginning of The Accident and meets Paul, a lawyer absorbed in an unhappy attachment. Their first impressions will not be sufficient company for the rest of the novel. Watch who can act, who can explain an action, and what the other person notices after the setting changes.
At the courthouse, Nora encounters a professional confidence Paul's private behavior had not prepared her for. She teaches French; she too has a life that exceeds this meeting. Let their work complicate what you think you know of them. Competence in one encounter need not make someone competent in the next, and discovering an ability is different from finally possessing the person.
The journey toward the mountains and skiing makes these discoveries practical. Someone has to know the equipment, arrange a departure, and teach what another person has not learned. Nora can organize things Paul has scarcely imagined doing. Companionship develops through those unequal abilities as well as through what they say about their feelings.
Choose the novel for romantic attention, physical vulnerability, and the possibility of interrupting an established unhappiness. Resist only the urge to decide too soon that an attractive scene has promised recovery. A mountain landscape also has bodies learning to move through it; let their next action earn the hope you place in the view.
In For Two Thousand Years, ask what each listener wants
The narrator of For Two Thousand Years meets people who want incompatible things from him. His mother wants safety, a fellow student asks for solidarity, and other students impose exclusion through humiliation and violence. To speak about belonging is already to answer somebody whose demand may cost him something.
After we have read about his assault, a barber asks if he still bears marks of the beating. The narrator denies being beaten. The barber is disappointed: he seems to have wanted a recognizable story of Jewish injury, and the young man has withheld it. Pride, concealment, and resistance to an assigned part can coexist here. Remember what the opening showed before accepting the denial as a cancellation of it.
Ask what would satisfy each listener. The question helps us hear why an inadequate argument can remain hard to escape: the person making it may be loved, admired, feared, or simply impossible to leave just then. The narrator's replies take place within those relations, where a defensible proposition does not necessarily make an answer easier to give.
Slow down for Professor Ghiță Blidaru. The narrator approaches an admired intelligence with more to ask than he manages to say. Hesitation and intimacy let authority work before doctrine has been examined. Notice what the professor can postpone because the student admires him, and what the student cannot bring himself to demand.
The narrator's doubts and evasions remain open to criticism. Being persecuted does not make every conclusion he reaches sound, and a weak conclusion does nothing to reduce the responsibility of the people persecuting him. Keep the two judgments available together as his attachments become uncomfortable to follow.
The preface has a different speaker
The 1934 volume contains Nae Ionescu's preface. Read it with the speaker's name firmly attached: this is Ionescu's argument about Jewish suffering. Its placement before Sebastian's novel does not turn it into the novelist's explanation of the people who follow.
Ionescu gives Jewish suffering an inescapable theological cause and, near the end, addresses Sebastian by his birth name, Iosef Hechter. The individual author has been summoned into a pronouncement about the fate of Jews before his fiction has begun. Attend to that act of address as well as to the doctrine it delivers.
You can return to the preface after the novel, or read it first while keeping its speaker distinct from the narrator and a modern edition's introductory voices. If the controversy becomes your main interest, seek Sebastian's response, How I Became a Hooligan (Cum am devenit huligan, 1935). The fact that he included the preface is a starting question about his reasons, not proof of all of them.
Give the Journal its dates back
The Journal records a present still underway. When Sebastian reports something extraordinary about a person, inspect the date and the route of knowledge: a meeting, a printed text, a remembered conversation, somebody else's report. A sentence extracted from its day may sound more settled than the entry in which he tried to live with it.
On February 12, 1935, radio music, new glasses, discussion of his novel, and public events around Nae Ionescu share the page. The apparent unevenness deserves patience. A person whose safety is becoming precarious can still be vain about his appearance, absorbed in music, or anxious to get work done. Those concerns belong to the day he has, before we arrange it into the history we know.
The political horror becomes intimate partly through that company. An acquaintance, a doctor, or an admired mind may also be someone with whom one has listened to music. Hostility can emerge inside an attachment that does not end as quickly as an outside reader would like. Extracting only the betrayal removes some of what made it difficult to recognize and painful to endure.
Begin with a manageable run of entries. Note recurring names if you need to, and consult the apparatus when a law, organization, or personal relation affects what the entry means. You can postpone identifying a passing acquaintance more safely than you can erase the difference between what Sebastian knew that day and what you know will follow.
That difference can make reading emotionally awkward. We grow impatient with a hope that returns or a friendship that persists. Let the entry retain an open future long enough to see what the attachment offered him. Understanding its persistence need not become an excuse for the friend's conduct.
Read the station before the star
The Star with No Name starts in a provincial railway station, where asking for a ticket does not yet amount to buying one. A peasant is sent from the door to the window, which need not open when he gets there. A teacher asks the time under an unreliable clock. Give these little delays their duration: the officials have plenty of procedure available and very little help.
Stage directions determine who can see the railway, who overhears, and when a gesture changes an answer. Later in the act, a traveler without a ticket arrives, and the arrangements become a means of restricting somebody's freedom. The fussy opening has taught us where a person can be stopped before that power is urgently needed.
Read a few exchanges aloud, including the pauses needed to open or close the window. The title can wait while people try to get tickets, information, and a way out. Restoring the time of their movements often restores the joke that silent reading has flattened into repeated words.
Questions that can otherwise interrupt the reading
Is For Two Thousand Years the diary?
No. It is a novel, originally published as De două mii de ani in 1934. Its first-person narration and journal-like passages can make the confusion understandable. Journal 1935–1944 is a separate, dated record of Sebastian's life. They can illuminate one another without becoming interchangeable evidence.
How much Romanian history should I know first?
Begin with enough orientation to know that Sebastian was a Jewish writer in a society where antisemitism affected university life, work, and personal relations. Then let the scenes specify the pressures. Consult the diary's notes as the circumstances change. Memorizing the period in advance can give you a false sense that you already know the day an entry will record.
Does the romantic fiction belong apart from the political work?
Read the romantic fiction on its own terms, leaving room to notice how often Sebastian's people misjudge or depend on somebody close to them. Intimacy can be a useful relation to follow across the books. It does not make a lover's disappointment equivalent to antisemitic exclusion; the causes, responsibilities, and consequences still have to be named in their own scale.
Which English editions and translators should I look for?
The Accident is available in Stephen Henighan's translation from Biblioasis. Philip Ó Ceallaigh translated For Two Thousand Years and Women, published by Other Press in the United States. Journal 1935–1944: The Fascist Years is translated by Patrick Camiller. Gabi Reigh translated The Star with No Name and The Town with Acacia Trees for Aurora Metro. Those last two titles correspond to Steaua fără nume and Orașul cu salcâmi; Women is Femei. Page numbers vary by edition, so dates, parts, and acts are often the better way to find a passage.
If you are choosing just one book now, choose the encounter you want: Nora and Paul trying to reach each other, a narrator resisting the identities demanded of him, a diarist recording a day still underway, or people trying to get through a station. The next book can change the kind of attention you bring to Sebastian without making the first one a preliminary exercise.
Sources
Mihail Sebastian, Accidentul. Fundația pentru Literatură și Artă “Regele Carol II,” 1940; chapters I and VI, especially pp. 141–156. Digitized original edition. English edition: The Accident, translated by Stephen Henighan, Biblioasis, 2011.
Mihail Sebastian, De două mii de ani. Editura Națională-Ciornei, [1934]; part I, sections I–II, pp. 5–15; part II, section I, pp. 47–52. Nae Ionescu's preface, pp. V–VIII and XXIX–XXXII. Digitized original edition. English edition: For Two Thousand Years, translated by Philip Ó Ceallaigh, Other Press, 2017.
Mihail Sebastian, Jurnal 1935–1944, second revised edition; text edited by Gabriela Omăt, preface and notes by Leon Volovici. Humanitas, 2016; February 12, 1935, pp. 19–20. Publisher's sample. English edition: Journal 1935–1944: The Fascist Years, translated by Patrick Camiller, Ivan R. Dee, 2000.
Mihail Sebastian, Steaua fără nume, act I, scenes I–II and XIII, pp. 4–11 and 36–40 in the Romanian text hosted by the Academy of Music, Theatre and Fine Arts, Moldova. English edition: The Star with No Name, translated by Gabi Reigh, Aurora Metro, 2020.
Additional English editions: Women, translated by Philip Ó Ceallaigh, Other Press, 2019; The Town with Acacia Trees, translated by Gabi Reigh, Aurora Metro, 2019. Humanitas edition of De două mii de ani and Cum am devenit huligan.
Comments